Skip to content

Review policy suggestions

Settings → AI Configuration → Learning is the review queue for suggested changes to your tool, budget, and checks-gate policies. It needs the view_policy_learning permission.

The loop is deliberately one directional: something observes how work actually ran, proposes a change, and a person decides. Nothing on this page changes a policy without you.

A suggestion is derived from observability signals over a trailing window: which tools were used, what runs cost, where gates fired. Those signals come from the platform’s own telemetry pipeline.

Each suggestion carries:

  • The change: which policy, and what it would become.
  • The rationale: the observation behind it, in a sentence.
  • A confidence: how strongly the signals support it.

Read the rationale before the change. A suggestion to raise a tool budget because a class of run kept stopping short is a different decision from the same change proposed because one run was unusual.

  • Apply writes the change to the policy and records the previous value.
  • Reject declines it, with a reason you type. The reason is worth writing, because it is what a later reviewer sees when a similar suggestion returns.
  • Rollback restores the previous value of a suggestion you applied. It is available on applied suggestions only, which is what makes applying a reversible act rather than a commitment.

Every decision is recorded in the audit log under the person who made it.

  1. Leave suggestions alone for a week rather than acting on the first one. A single run is not a pattern.
  2. Apply one at a time. Two applied together make the next week’s signals unreadable.
  3. Watch the area the change touches for a few days.
  4. Roll back rather than tuning around a change that made things worse.
  • Budgets: the policy most suggestions touch.
  • The audit log: where applied and rolled-back changes are recorded.
  • Router policy: the other page whose controls are not yet enforced.